City of Ryde DA Tracking


Application Details
Application IDLDA2019/0282
DescriptionDemolition, new dual occupancy (attached).
GroupDevelopment Application
CategoryResidential
Sub CategoryDemolition, New Dual Occupancy
StatusCurrent
Lodgement Date15/08/2019
Stage/DecisionRefused
Estimated Cost$611,600.00


Properties
Address2 Darcy St MARSFIELD NSW 2122
Land DescriptionLot 8 DP 237899


Additional Information
Lodged15/08/2019
Determined12/05/2020


Name Details
NameAgc Architects P/L
AssociationApplicant


Events
Application LodgedLodged15/08/201915/08/2019
Allocate to Assessment OfficerCompleted19/08/201919/08/2019
Which type of delegation is required?Manager Assessment3/09/20193/09/2019
Is notification required?14 days19/08/201920/08/2019
Referral sent to Tree Management OfficerCompleted20/08/201920/08/2019
Referral sent to Development EngineerCompleted20/08/201920/08/2019
Referral sent to Development EngineerCompleted21/10/201921/02/2020
Has satisfactory information been received?No12/02/202012/02/2020
Referral sent to Tree Management OfficerCompleted21/02/202021/02/2020
Referral sent to Development EngineerCompleted7/05/20207/05/2020
Refer to Manager AssessmentRefused12/05/202012/05/2020


Related Applications
Application ID
DescriptionSection 8.3 application to review of Council's refusal of LDA2019/0282 for demolition and construction of dual occupancy (attached) with strata subdivision.
RelationshipChild


Notification Period and Reasons for Decision
DescriptionAdvertising & Notification
NoteNotification letters sent 20/08/19- Submissions closing 06/09/2019 Amended plans notified 21/02/2020 - closing 10/03/2020

DescriptionReasons for Decision
NoteThat LDA No. LDA2019/0282 at 2 Darcy Street Marsfield be refused for the following reasons: 1. Ryde LEP 2014 - Aims and objectives for residential zones. The proposed new development has not been designed to provide orderly and economic use of land, good amenity or promote the proper maintenance of the dual occupancy (attached) in the residential zone. 2. Ryde LEP 2014 ‘Floor Space Ratio’. The development results in an FSR of 0.51:1 which exceeds the maximum permitted FSR of 0.50:1. The applicant has not provided a Clause 4.6 Variation to support this non-compliance. 3. Ryde DCP 2014: Part 8.3 ‘Driveways’. The development does not comply with the requirements of Part 8.3 ‘Driveways’ as the driveway off Blundell Street is not shown to be parallel as required in Council’s DCP. As proposed, the development would impact on Council’s drainage system in an unsupportable manner. 4. Ryde DCP 2014: Part 3.3 - Section 2.6.2 ‘Topography & Excavation’. The development does not reflect the natural topography of the site as the dwelling opposing Darcy Street is elevated 1.66m above the natural ground level. This will contribute to the massing of bulk and scale to the dwelling which will negatively impact the streetscape of Blundell and Darcy Street. 5. Ryde DCP 2014: Part 3.3 - Section 2.9.1 ‘Front Setbacks’. The development does not comply with Section 2.9.1 ‘Front Setbacks’ of Council’s DCP as the proposed frontage of the dwelling opposing Blundell Street is setback less than 2m. 6. Ryde DCP 2014: Part 3.3 - Section 2.13 ‘Landscaping’. The development does not comply with Section 2.9.1 ‘Landscaping’ specifically regarding the implementation of obstruction-free pathways connecting the rear and front yards of the dwellings. The daily amenity of future occupants will further be reduced by the interior layout of the stairway and laundry entry and it is for these reasons that the current design cannot be supported. 7. Inconsistent Details. The proposed new development will result in a poor design as the architectural, landscaping and stormwater plans do not correspond in regards to driveway crossovers and garage sizes. 8. Undesirable Precedent. Approval of the proposed development would establish a precedent by consenting to an application that would enable the legitimisation of a poorly submitted and planned proposal.


Related Documents





© Technology One Limited 2024